Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

Judge #Kaplan overruled it and suggested that he was more concerned about #shutting down any encrypted communication than offering SBF a small convenience

#Kaplan did not provide a reason for denying the #motion but added the subject would be further discussed in a Feb. 9 hearing.

At the time, #Kaplan noted his order was likely to be #appealed given the novelty of the circumstances.

The appeal was #expected after a Jan. 30 ruling in which United States District Judge Lewis #Kaplan granted a joint petition from eight major media outlets seeking to unseal the guarantors' names.

“#Moreover, the information sought, ie, the names of the bail sureties, traditionally is public information,” #Kaplan added.

#Kaplan further argued that #Bankman-Fried’s parents faced #intense scrutiny due to their close relationship with their son,

In his ruling, #Kaplan said he has “no reason” to doubt threats had occurred but was yet to see “evidence to that #effect,”

An unsealing of the guarantors’ names also isn’t guaranteed, as #Kaplan has given #Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel until Feb. 7 to contest the decision.

According to the Jan. 30 filing, #Kaplan granted the joint #petition from eight #media outlets to unseal the names of the two individuals,

“#Moreover, the information sought, ie, the names of the bail sureties, traditionally is public information,” #Kaplan added.

#Kaplan further argued that #Bankman-Fried’s parents faced #intense scrutiny due to their close relationship with their son,

In his ruling, #Kaplan said he has “no reason” to doubt threats had occurred but was yet to see “evidence to that #effect,”

demanded public disclosure of the two individuals responsible for guaranteeing the bond in a Jan. 12 letter addressed to District Court #Judge #Lewis #Kaplan.

An unsealing of the guarantors’ names also isn’t guaranteed, as #Kaplan has given #Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel until Feb. 7 to contest the decision.

According to the Jan. 30 filing, #Kaplan granted the joint #petition from eight #media outlets to unseal the names of the two individuals,

#Moreover, the information sought, ie, the names of the bail sureties, traditionally is public information,” #Kaplan added.

#Kaplan further argued that #Bankman-Fried’s parents faced #intense scrutiny due to their close relationship with their son,

In his ruling, #Kaplan said he has “no reason” to doubt threats had occurred but was yet to see “evidence to that #effect,”

demanded public disclosure of the two individuals responsible for guaranteeing the bond in a Jan. 12 letter addressed to District Court #Judge #Lewis #Kaplan.

An unsealing of the guarantors’ names also isn’t guaranteed, as #Kaplan has given #Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel until Feb. 7 to contest the decision.

According to the Jan. 30 filing, #Kaplan granted the joint #petition from eight #media outlets to unseal the names of the two individuals,

“#Moreover, the information sought, ie, the names of the bail sureties, traditionally is public information,” #Kaplan added.

#Kaplan further argued that #Bankman-Fried’s parents faced #intense scrutiny due to their close relationship with their son,

In his ruling, #Kaplan said he has “no reason” to doubt threats had occurred but was yet to see “evidence to that #effect,”

demanded public disclosure of the two individuals responsible for guaranteeing the bond in a Jan. 12 letter addressed to District Court #Judge #Lewis #Kaplan.

An unsealing of the guarantors’ names also isn’t guaranteed, as #Kaplan has given #Bankman-Fried’s legal counsel until Feb. 7 to contest the decision.