The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
TipMeACoffeebeta
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The drop below $1,400 on March 10 was illogical if the #correlation #between application-focused tech stocks and the price of Ether remains valid
The drop below $1,400 on March 10 was illogical if the #correlation #between application-focused tech stocks and the price of Ether remains valid
The drop below $1,400 on March 10 was illogical if the #correlation #between application-focused tech stocks and the price of Ether remains valid
The #correlation coefficient between BTC and the DXY has moved from -0.25 to -0.70, #indicating an increasing inverse relationship between the two.
#Correlation coefficients range between 1 and -1, with the former indicating a #direct pricing relationship, and the latter indicating a completely inverse one.
BTC’s #correlation with the tech-heavy Nasdaq #composite has increased from 0.33 to 0.50 over the same period.
While a 0.50 #correlation is relatively moderate, its #trajectory higher is worth monitoring, particularly as the relationship with the DXY is inverting.
The drop below $1,400 on March 10 was illogical if the #correlation #between application-focused tech stocks and the price of Ether remains valid
The drop below $1,400 on March 10 was illogical if the #correlation #between application-focused tech stocks and the price of Ether remains valid
The drop below $1,400 on March 10 was illogical if the #correlation #between application-focused tech stocks and the price of Ether remains valid
However, the three #reasons that supported the price gain, including #correlation with tech stocks, its increasing total value locked and its deflationary token economics, all suggest that the path to $2,000 is set in stone.